Actually, it’s okay to say "marijuana" instead of "cannabis"

As marijuana becomes widespread, people are reconsidering the term, stating that we must abandon "marijuana" because it is racist, and instead, say "cannabis." People should say whatever they want, but this rule is too simplistic for a complex drug. We should develop plus no less, words for what we need to say.

It makes sense that some want to avoid "word m". Marijuana has always had a unique place in the history of the United States. and politics, according to academic Emily Dufton, author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana Activism in America . No other drug has inspired this type of debate and has been linked to issues ranging from war to racism and criminal justice. (Dufton is an "equal opportunity user" of words, and says that part of the fun of writing about this drug is the ability to use many different terms.)

But the word "marijuana" is not racist. It was once a means of rebellion, says Santiago Iván Guerra, professor of southwestern studies at the Colorado College. When Europeans first arrived in present-day Mexico, they ordered indigenous residents to convert to Christianity and stop cultivating their own psychoactive drugs (bell, peyote, and psilocybin). On the other hand, the Mexican indigenous people were told to grow hemp to have rope.

It was then that residents discovered that this hemp plant could be psychoactive. To hide that they were using it, they began coding the language, Guerra says. Many plants in Mexico have some version of "Maria" in the name, to please the Spaniards who promoted Christianity. And so the plant became "marijuana."

In the 1930s, US government officials like Harry Anslinger used "marijuana" as pejorative to make the drug sound exotic and link it to poor Mexicans, although many whites smoked well. (Anslinger was influenced by elite Mexicans, who also considered the plant to be low class, according to Guerra). Nowadays, there is still a division of the language. People who support legalization tend to call the drug "cannabis", and those who do not call it "marijuana": just look at Attorney General Jeff "Good people sessions do not smoke marijuana." So, the idea is that "good people" with chronic pain use "cannabis" as medicine, and it should be legalized to help them. Calling something "cannabis" gives it scientific legitimacy and respectability.

Yes, cannabis is the scientific name. But it is not very precise, and even plant biologists get stuck in terms of language. Cannabis actually refers to a category of plants, says Jonathan Page, an associate professor in the Department of Botany at the University of British Columbia and executive director of startup Anandia Labs, a specialist in cannabis detection. The plant that people know and love (or hate) is Cannabis sativa . (The jury discusses whether there are other cannabis species, such as Cannabis indica and Cannabis ruderalis although, confusingly, people use words like "indica" to describe the strains Cannabis sativa .) And there is more: "cannabis" means both the drug that people smoke to get high, like hemp, which is not psychoactive and is used for fabrics. The same plant, different purposes, same word.

In Page's lab, uppercase cannabis refers to genus and lowercase they refer to the plant. He also uses "hemp" to describe cannabis that is grown for seeds for food or textiles. The psychoactive plant is called "pharmacological type cannabis" and then will use "cannabis" to describe only the part of the flower.

This is uncomfortable! It's hard to imagine teenagers saying, "Let's smoke some drug-type cannabis," right? "He will want to use language that corresponds to the way ordinary people use medicine," says Geoffrey Nunberg, a linguist who teaches at the UC Berkeley Information School. "I do not think that cannabis is going to drive out marijuana in the general lexicon." In addition, he adds, words always change their meanings.

With "marijuana," there was always "a sort of humorous furtiveness about the drug," says Nunberg. The jargon word "pot" probably comes from the Spanish "potiguaya" (seeds), and the terms like "herb" and "herb" were meant to be ironic terms, poking at anti-marijuana propaganda like Reefer Madness . There will always be a variety of words used to describe drugs.

Getting rid of "marijuana" probably will not make a big difference to stigma, says Guerra. "I do not think changing the word 'marijuana' for marijuana serves to silence the stigma of what really happened and what happened during the war against cannabis and the people it targets," Guerra says. "I would not change the motives or arguments of either side"

. There are benefits to keeping it. Not only is it a simple way to describe "the floral part of cannabis of pharmacological type", but it reminds us that the plant is not simply a medicine. Moving on to the single scientific and medicinal "cannabis" does not necessarily make it clear that it is okay to use cannabis for non-scientific and non-medicinal reasons.

And replacing "marijuana" with "cannabis" can erase its history. "The term should continue to be used so that people have to remember this problematic history and the problematic relationship we have with this plant and the kind of relationships that are created between different populations," Guerra says. As Page points out, the UBC botanist, it is rare that there is a different name for a part of the plant, such as the flower, in addition to the plant itself. It is the result of the involvement of marijuana in different areas.

So, we do not have to discard the term completely, but we must remember its history. And we should use the best term for the best purpose. It makes sense to talk about "cannabis" when it comes to scientific study, and "marijuana" when talking about recreational use. And the words are still changing. For example, the term "dabbing" refers to a way in which people consume marijuana, but it has also been used to talk about a type of concentrate, according to Guerra. "We need academics to document and see where the patterns are that would allow us to understand these nuances," he says. This is a living discussion in a living language.